Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 15 results ...
Antillon, E I, Molenaar, K R and Javernick-Will, A (2017) Evaluating the Effect of Contract Timing on Lifecycle-Design Innovation in Public–Private Partnerships: Comparative Case Study of Highway Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Cavalcante, C A V, Alencar, M H and Lopes, R S (2017) Multicriteria Model to Support Maintenance Planning in Residential Complexes under Warranty. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Chih, Y, Kiazad, K, Li, M, Capezio, A, Zhou, L and Restubog, S L D (2017) Broken Promises: Implications for the Job Insecurity and Job Performance of Chinese Construction Workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Delgado-Hernandez, D J, Cruz-Cruz, C C and Vences-García, P Y (2017) Improvement Management Tools in the Construction Industry: Case Study of Mexico. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Fang, Y and Cho, Y K (2017) Effectiveness Analysis from a Cognitive Perspective for a Real-Time Safety Assistance System for Mobile Crane Lifting Operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Gao, R, Chan, A P C, Utama, W P and Zahoor, H (2017) Workers’ Perceptions of Safety Climate in International Construction Projects: Effects of Nationality, Religious Belief, and Employment Mode. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Gunduz, M, Birgonul, M T and Ozdemir, M (2017) Fuzzy Structural Equation Model to Assess Construction Site Safety Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Khan, A, Do, J and Kim, D (2017) Experimental Optimization of High-Strength Self-Compacting Concrete Based on D-Optimal Design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Liu, R, Du, J, Issa, R R A and Giel, B (2017) BIM Cloud Score: Building Information Model and Modeling Performance Benchmarking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
McCabe, B Y, Alderman, E, Chen, Y, Hyatt, D E and Shahi, A (2017) Safety Performance in the Construction Industry: Quasi-Longitudinal Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Ozorhon, B and Oral, K (2017) Drivers of Innovation in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Praticò, F G (2017) Metrics for Management of Asphalt Plant Sustainability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Wang, D, Arditi, D and Damci, A (2017) Construction Project Managers’ Motivators and Human Values. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Xu, J, Jiang, L and Moon, S (2017) Determination of the Optimal Concession Period for BOT Contract Projects Based on a Discrete Stochastic Process Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
Yu, T, Shen, G Q and Shi, Q (2017) Comparing the Performance Quality of Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build Delivery Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(04).
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Design-bid-build; Design-build; Economic theories; Performance quality; Project profits; Quality-profit equilibrium points; Contracting;
- ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001262
- Abstract:
The choice of delivery method is one of the most important decisions that can determine the quality of construction projects. Two basic delivery methods, design-bid-build and design-build, have been compared in terms of project quality; however, an important quality dimension, performance quality, has generally been ignored in previous studies. In this study, the authors used existing economic theories to develop a model to examine the performance quality and project profits of these two delivery methods. The equilibrium points of the model were analyzed with consideration given to influencing factors such as cost coefficient, cooperation efficiency, and coordination cost. Four propositions were made to facilitate the quality-profit comparisons between design-bid-build and design-build. The first proposition showed that to maximize personal profit, the project coordinator should always keep a balance between design quality and construction quality, regardless of the delivery method. The other three propositions indicated that both methods can generate relatively higher levels of performance quality and project profits in an appropriate project environment. Based on these propositions, the authors ranked the performance quality and profits of the two methods within different conditions and used a real project to exhibit the practical value of these findings. Via case study, cooperation efficiency was identified as the most critical factor that determines the selection of delivery method. In addition, three key steps were summarized to facilitate the application of the model developed in this study.